Some of the points we discussed were:
¢ In an ethics class we take students – and don’t in our classes in Higher Education –transmit an ethic.
¢ We school our students in the problems of identifying the good – but we refrain from dictating their conclusions.
¢ They come to us, they ponder the good –then we set them loose..
¢ What have we done?
¢ We ask that they understand, but not that they implement…
I asked whether we ought to see ourselves also as helping students develop their moral character? Unlike a more straight empirical discipline, the teaching of ethics may be an area where we wish to bring about in some sense a transformation of the student: should this be our goal?
Dave
Hello David,
ReplyDeleteThis is a very interesting topic for me. First, I just had to click on the "big sky" title because I would like to think that we have big skies in Colorado too. Second, I am pursuing my master's degree at Naropa University in Religious Studies. This is a little odd since my undergrad degree was Political Science.
My eventual goal is to find a way to teach tolerance in the classroom. I would like to think that tolerance could be considered a civic ethic, but I am not completely sure that America is there yet.
I am intrigued by your question about the transformation of the student. I wonder if the transformative (i hope, anyway) practice of compassion can be part of the traditional classroom. On the other hand, my university goes a little overboard on the contemplative side of things. Seriously, renouncing the world and sitting on a pillow is a bit of a cop-out if you ask me. My question is: how can one achieve a balance between intellect and intuition while remaining engaged with others? I still struggle with that one and I hope to pass the conundrum on to the next generation.
Laura (from the Philosophers list)
Be assured - there are no pillows to sit on at the University of Gloucestershire...
ReplyDelete